01 — Stage
Early, and honest about it.
There is no product to sell, no benchmark published, and no claim here that the model works. What exists is a thesis, the published work below, and a plan for the measurements that come first.
We would rather this page understate where things stand than have to walk something back later. When there is a result, it will be on the site, with the baseline it was scored against.
02 — Publications
The measurements this approach is built on are already in print.
-
Analytical Chemistry · 2026
Characterizing the Effects of Protein Glycosylation Perturbation on Phosphorylation Signaling
-
Analytical Chemistry · 2026
Dose-Dependent Inhibition of Protein Glycosylation Reveals Crosstalk between Glycosylation and Phosphorylation in EGF Signaling Pathways
-
bioRxiv · preprint, under review
Sialidase-Mediated Desialylation Regulating EGFR Phosphorylation and Signal Flux
Three perturbation classes — genetic, chemical dose, enzymatic — each read across glycosylation and phosphorylation on the same material. Raw data is deposited and public under the accessions listed.
03 — Get in touch
Worth an email if any of these describe you.
You build cell models
Virtual-cell, perturbation-response, or foundation models for biology, and you have wondered what the protein layer would add.
You run the instruments
Proteomics at scale, particularly modification-enriched workflows and designed perturbation series.
You think this is wrong
Genuinely welcome. The fastest way to improve the thesis is to hear the strongest argument against it.